Site Map - Companion Animal Protection Society
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 20:00

Tennessee Commercial Breeder Act

On July 8th, Gov. Phil Bredesen of Tennessee signed legislation meant to regulate mass breeding facilities. The state finally added a law in its books that requires breeders to give basic humane care to animals and be subject to inspections. The move shows a step forward in the fight against puppy mills and indicates a change in the public's opinion about the issue. Despite the efforts, the change won't eliminate the problem. Lawmakers aren't attempting to outlaw puppy mills, they are trying to regulate breeding facilities.

The bill was significantly weakened by several amendments and revisions. Originally, the proposition placed a limit of 75 intact dogs per commercial breeder which would only affect puppy mills since most reputable breeders are small scale operations. Also, the bill no longer authorizes confiscation of animals or criminal penalties, using civil fines of $50 to $1000 per violation instead.

One of the most important aspects of the law is that large scale commercial operations with more than 20 unsterilized female dogs maintained for breeding purposes must obtain a license from the Department of Health. It establishes that inspections are a prerequisite for licensure as well as abiding by new humane care standards for dogs and cats. The bill also holds the mass breeders accountable by forcing them to adhere to Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, which would allow people who bought sick dogs to seek legal actions against the puppy mill operators.

The bill was first introduced by state Sen. Doug Jackson after witnessing the conditions in a Tennessee puppy mill operated by Patricia Adkisson . The owner of the infamous Tennessee facility was charged with 24 counts of felony aggravated cruelty and nine counts of misdemeanor animal cruelty. For more information about the bill, visit the">Animal Law Coalition website or read the bill summary from the Tennessee government website
Published in CAPS News
Wednesday, 07 September 2011 20:00

Angry letter against “BREEDER BASHING”

The following letter proves that CAPS is doing its job:


You AR whacko nut jobs make me sick to my stomach. How dare you try to take away my right to own dogs & cats. How dare you try to take away my right to show & breed dogs. My right to enjoy watching and maybe in the future competing in the Westminster Kennel club dog show. How dare take away my right to buy a well bred, quality pure bred AKC registered dog from health tested champion parents from a good breeder. You people are truly screwed up in the head. If I lived in Glendale that new ordinance would not make me adopt from a shelter or rescue, I'd just go to the next town or next county over and get one or go out of state to purchase my breed of choice from a good breeder. Most of the people who would buy from a pet store would never consider adopting from a shelter in the first place but you are too stupid to realize it. What is so wrong with a person wanting a purebred dog who's parents they get to see & interact with, who's back ground they know about via the pedigree & the breeder vs a dog they know nothing about. Who's to say those mutts they adopted's parents didn't have some kind of genetic health problem or temperament issue, behavior issue that that dog could have inherited and you pawned them off to the bleeding hearts as a good pet. Then the dog goes home settles in and its true aggressive temperament comes out & it attacks the person's kid. Why should I not have the right to go to a good breeder who shows, health tests before breeding, only produces 1-3 litters a year, only allows their girls to have 1 litter a year & only 3 litters in the bitch's life time? You supporting that ban on the sale of pups out of the home doesn't only affect the back yard breeders & Puppy millers but it also affects good responsible, reputable, ethical breeders as well. After all all good breeders do NOT sell to pet stores but sell out of their homes. How are those breeders supposed to find their pups homes if they are not allowed to sell them directly out of their homes? You would be running them out of breeding as well as they would have no choice but to either stop breeding or to move to a more breeder friendly county. Of course that's what you people want, you want all breeding of dogs & cats to cease & want all dogs & cats spayed & neutered out of existence. You cream your jeans at thought of AKC' no longer being in existence. You cherish the thought of no more dog shows. You love the thought of pets being a thing of the past. You love the thought of my grand children being denied the privilege of having a dog of their own. You cherish the idea that all my grand children will have is stories of dogs & cats, where they will see shows like Lassie, Rin Tin Tin & wonder what it was like in the days that every boy had a dog to play with. I despise you for that, I despise you for you trying to dictate where I should get my dog from. I believe I'm capable of making that choice myself. I'm smart enough to know not to buy from a puppy miller, I know the questions to ask & what to look for, I don't need you telling me or trying to get laws in acted to force me to get a dog from a shelter if I don't want to. There are lots of reasons a person would opt to buy instead of adopt. First of all you can't show a shelter dog, second they want a dog for a certain task such as hunting, if I want a rabbit dog then I'm gonna get a dog of a breed I know has a reputation of being good rabbit dogs aka Beagles and I'm gonna want one that was specifically bred & trained for that purpose not some mutt. If I want a protection dog then I'm gonna get a breed that I know has a history & reputation of being a good protection dog aka a Doberman, Rottie, German Shepherd, and I'm gonna choose to buy from someone who specifically breeds them for that purpose & proves it with Schutzhund titles not some shelter mutt. Myself I already own two mutts, my Dachshund X Scottie Buffy who I saved from going to the shelter when she was 5wks old, YES she is spayed & my German Shepherd mix Hobo who was dumped & abandoned near my street by his owner, made his way to my home & set up residence, then captured my heart so I took him in as my own, and took him got his shots, heartworm meds (yes he was heartworm positive & had him neutered, my next dog however will be a show bred AKC registered show potential miniature longhaired Dachshund & will be purchased from a good breeder. Who do you think you are to tell me I can't do so or condemn me for doing so. What you should be doing along with promoting shelters & rescues is promoting good responsible breeders as well. You should be educating people on what to look for, what questions to ask, what should throw up red flags to them if they insist of buying from a breeder so that they can ensure they are buying from a good breeder. Why should good breeders be harmed just because of a few bad seeds, its not right and you know it. More and more people are awakening to you AR whacko nut job, HSUS loving PETAPHILES and your true agenda of no more pets, no more eating meat, no more fishing, no more hunting, no more dog shows, no more cat shows, no more horse races, no more zoos, no more circuses, no more breeding, no more horse shows, no more animal shows of any kind, no more movies portraying animals & we will continue to fight & will continue waking up others. Yes puppy mills are a problem & should be stopped but good breeders need not be hurt in the process. We also know of your pet over population lies & how lots of shelters actually have an under population and are importing dogs from other countries to fill their shelters, how they are stealing innocent breeders' dogs & screaming puppy mill & spouting lies about those breeders to justify the theft of said dogs just to keep their shelters' doors open. We know that true puppy mills are very few & far between & this "Puppy Mill" witch hunt needs to end and end it we will. We hear the stories day in and day out about good breeders who were victimized by you people & the lies you tell to justify your actions. STOP THE VICTIMIZATION OF GOOD BREEDERS, STOP THE BREEDER BASHING. We are breeders NOT criminals!


Patricia Moore

Published in CAPS News
Saturday, 28 January 2012 19:00

Dog and Cat Breeder Regulation Bill Update

Forwarded from Stop the Suffering:

Dog and Cat Breeder Regulation Bill S.F. 462 (Senator Barb Goodwin) H.F. 702 (Representative John Lesch)
The 2012 Minnesota legislative session began on January 24, and a very important bill needs your help. S.F. 462/H.F. 702 (Dog and Cat Breeder Regulation Bill) was introduced in 2011. It is still alive and has a chance to be heard during the 2012 Minnesota legislative session. Minnesota has no state laws, rules, licensing or regulations to address the care of cats and dogs in commercial breeding facilities. That is why this bill is so important. S.F. 462/H.F. 702 will provide basic licensing and regulation for this industry. A large Coalition of humane societies, rescue groups, animal control, veterinarians, and individuals have been working hard for several years to pass legislation to regulate this industry - plus numerous other supporters, including other humane societies, rescue groups, veterinarians, law enforcement, students, legislators, businesses and community members representing the interests of Minnesota who understand the need for breeder regulation have been working with the Coalition to help pass these bills.

We need YOUR help in raising awareness and educating legislators. Your voice can make a difference in the lives of dogs and cats in Minnesota. See below for bill status, talking points and how you can help.

Below is information about the Dog and Cat Breeder Regulation Bill (S.F. 462/H.F. 702).
Bill Status S.F. 462/H.F. 702 was introduced in the 2011 Minnesota legislative session. As Minnesota operates on a two-year legislative cycle (2011-2012), S.F. 462/H.F. 702 can be heard in 2012 - same language and same bill numbers. As soon as the bills are granted a hearing in a committee, we will email you and let you know the names and phone numbers of the committee members for you to contact; and we will send you a short message to convey. It will be important to call them within a day or two of receiving the email to let them know of your support. Be sure to mention the bill numbers and authors’ names because there are multiple breeder bills.

Bill Recap
A recap of what was accomplished in 2011:
Many meetings were held with legislators educating them on inhumane dog and cat breeding in Minnesota and explaining why S.F. 462/H.F. 702 is needed.
Meetings were also held with veterinarians, the Board of Animal Health, the Minnesota Veterinary Medical Association, large and small breeders, sportsmen/women, and other stakeholders to gather input and provide feedback and information.
Over 40 Minnesota shelters, rescues, and animal control, and the Animal Law Section of the MN State Bar Association support S.F. 462/H.F. 702.
Over 180 Minnesota veterinarians and vet techs have signed letters supporting these bills (more are signing on each week).
Over 7,700 petitions were signed by Minnesotans in 2011 and over 10,000 in 2010 which were all delivered to the constituents’ Senators and Representatives. As petitions arrive in 2012, those will be delivered to legislators as well.

Opposition is strong from agri-business and their associations, some sportsmen/women groups, the National Rifle Association, breeder registries, and some breeders (Reputable breeders already comply with existing Minnesota anti-cruelty laws and understand the need for regulation; they expect that of all breeders).
Coalition members include A Rotta Love Plus, Animal Folks MN, Animal Humane Society, Minnesota Animal Control Association, Minnesota Humane Society, Minnesota Voters for Animal Protection, Minnkota Persian Rescue, Pet Haven Inc. of Minnesota, Prairie's Edge Humane Society, Retrieve A Golden of Minnesota, Second Chance Animal Rescue, Tri-County Humane Society, and individuals.

The Problem There is no State oversight and there are no State laws, inspections or regulations covering dog and cat breeding facilities in Minnesota; as a result, dogs and cats are harmed by inhumane breeding practices. Minnesota is also among the top producers of puppies in the United States with some of the largest breeding kennels in the nation - housing 300, 600 or over 1,000 dogs and puppies. Kittens, too, are mass-produced in Minnesota.

The conditions can be horrific:
Many dogs and cats living out their lives in small, overcrowded wire cages and bred repeatedly.
Cages are often stacked, allowing feces and urine to fall onto the animals below.
Animals may be malnourished from inadequate food and water.
Animals receive little or no veterinary care, are stressed from constant confinement and neglect, have fleas, worms, etc.
Many have deformed paws, are severely matted, or are burned from sitting and standing in urine and feces.
And, they are rarely, if at all, provided human socialization.

While many breeders in Minnesota act responsibly, there are increasing reports of those who keep dogs and cats in deplorable conditions and who are willing to make a profit at the expense of the animals’ health and wellbeing. The puppies and kittens are then sold to the public and many are sick, diseased, and have genetic problems. In Addition USDA only licenses breeders who sell wholesale Only breeders who breed and deal puppies and kittens wholesale (e.g., pet shops, etc.) are licensed and inspected by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); and USDA inspection reports show multiple ongoing violations and enforcement is lacking.

The vast majority of breeders in Minnesota do not sell to pet stores, but sell directly to the public, such as through websites, parking lots or newspaper ads. None of these activities are regulated. Current "system" is not working Animal anti-cruelty laws exist in Minnesota . But these laws kick in after the cruelty occurs - if someone files a complaint and if action is taken.

Regulation is preventative - allowing authorities to legally inspect breeding facilities so cruelty can be prevented before it occurs. Relying solely on citizen complaints, cruelty investigations and prosecution is time-consuming and costly for local law enforcement, animal control, nonprofit animal shelters and rescue organizations, and the courts. Regulation is a more efficient use of resources.

Sales tax not being paid
Many commercial dog and cat breeders are not paying the required State sales tax on the puppies and kittens sold, resulting in millions of dollars of lost revenue to the State. Other states are already regulated Because our neighboring states (Wisconsin, Iowa and Nebraska) all have breeder regulation laws on the books, Minnesota will soon become a “safe haven” for inhumane breeders to move.

The Solution:
The goal of breeder regulation is healthy and safe dogs and cats within commercial breeding facilities. S.F. 462 and H.F. 702 address the problem of inhumane breeding by giving the State of Minnesota the authority to:
License - Require commercial dog and cat breeders in Minnesota to be licensed;
Inspect and Enforce - Give legal authority to the Board of Animal Health to inspect commercial dog and cat breeding facilities and enforce existing State laws to ensure animal care standards are met; and
Penalties - Impose civil, administrative and criminal penalties for those who violate the law.

S.F. 462 and H.F. 702 are responsible bills because they address the core problem, work hand-in-hand with existing Minnesota anti-cruelty laws, and have strong support.

Please contact your own State Senator and Representative now. Ask them to support S.F. 462 (authored by Senator Goodwin) and H.F. 702 (authored by Representative Lesch) and educate them on what goes on in Minnesota dog and cat breeding facilities. Getting to know your legislators is important; relationships are key to winning trust and votes. If you don’t know who your State Senator and Representative are (or your district), you can find that information at:

To learn more about dog and cat breeding in Minnesota, sign a petition and more, please visit

Get Others Involved:
Please ask your family and friends to join this effort by emailing us and requesting to be added to the database – This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Thank you for caring and getting involved. Stop the Suffering * If you would like to watch other Minnesota bills relating to animals, see below.

SUPPORT: S.F. 705/H.F. 1098 (authored by Senator John Marty/Rep. Joe Mullery) repeals a very old law that requires publicly funded shelters/impounds to surrender unclaimed stray animals to research facilities that request them. Minnesota is one of only two states remaining that requires this practice. Since MN research facilities have not taken pets from impound facilities in at least 10 years, it is time to repeal this law. As of this date, S.F. 705 passed out of the Senate Agriculture Committee in 2011 and was referred to the Senate Finance Committee. H.F. 1098 was heard in the House Agriculture Committee and was laid over for possible inclusion in the Ag. Omnibus bill but was not included in 2011.

OPPOSE: S.F. 1118/H.F. 1369 (authored by Senator Doug Magnus/Rep. Rod Hamilton) is a bill that, among other things, would make it a crime to videotape and show footage taken inside puppy/kitten mills and factory farms. It would criminalize whistle blowing on animal cruelty issues and food safety problems inside these facilities, even for the news media. As you can imagine, there is much opposition from animal welfare organizations, environmental groups, and anyone caring about free speech. This bill has received a lot of negative publicity throughout the United States. To date, neither has received a hearing.

OPPOSE: H.F. 1635 (authored by Rep. Rod Hamilton/no Senate companion as of this date) is a bill that amends the current “Pet Lemon Law” by including nonprofit humane societies and rescue groups under this law and defining them as “pet dealers." The Pet Lemon Law, passed in 1992, is a consumer protection law that was created to regulate for-profit businesses (defined as pet shops, breeders and dealers of dogs and cats). By including humane societies and rescue groups under this law, these organizations would have to follow the same requirements as for-profit businesses, such as conducting two veterinarian exams of each animal (one exam 2 days after receipt of the animal and one exam 4 days prior to the sale), thus incurring additional expenses. Unlike for-profit businesses, nonprofits take in strays, owner surrendered, abused, neglected and seized animals who have varying medical and health conditions. Some animals are old, injured or neglected and require additional vet care (including dogs and cats rescued from breeding facilities). Most nonprofits are not even able to recoup the vet expenses put into the animals they receive. Again, the intent of the Pet Lemon law is to regulate businesses that make a profit from the breeding, dealing and selling of dogs and cats, not to regulate nonprofits that clean up societies' problems.

OPPOSE: H.F. 516 (Rep. Bruce Vogel)/no Senate companion as of this date). The bill removes the mandate to enforce the dangerous dog and stray dog laws and removes the reporting section of the dangerous exotic animal law. All of these changes were a huge concern for public safety reasons and also for the welfare of the animals. The bill was heard in the House Agriculture Committee where there was testimony in opposition by animal control representatives and a letter in opposition from The Wildcat Sanctuary. The bill was held over and not voted on. BUT, Rep. Steve Drazkowski took the dangerous dog and stray dog sections and put them into one of his own bills that had already been introduced and was granted a hearing in the House Government Operations (H.F. 7). At the hearing of H.F. 7, he amended the above troubling language into his bill. There was no one there to testify in opposition but there were some questions asked by committee members. The bill passed that committee and is being watched carefully so that testifiers in opposition will be able to attend the next committee hearing.
Published in CAPS News
Publication/Event date: 2012-02-09

Publication name: Democrat and Chronicle

URL for more info:

The Town Board in this Ontario County community got an earful at a meeting Wednesday from people opposed to a dog-breeding facility planned for the town.

Town officials said at the meeting that a tentative permit for the facility will be voided.

Continue reading...
Published in CAPS News
Thanks to CAPS West Coast Director Carole Davis for not only presenting our investigation but recommending that the city introduce an ordinaThanks to CAPS West Coast Director Carole Davis for not only presenting our investigation but recommending that the city introduce an ordinance!
Publication/Event date: 2012-04-17
Publication name:
CBS Los Angeles
URL for more info:
LOS ANGELES (CBS) — The L.A. City Council voted Tuesday in favor of banning stores from selling dogs, cats and rabbits that are not rescues in an effort to curb the city’s animal euthanasia rates.
Eleven members of the council approved the motion, which will be drafted by the City Attorney’s Office into an ordinance banning pet sales. Councilman Bill Rosendahl cast the dissenting vote. Continue reading the article…
Published in CAPS News
Sunday, 22 April 2012 03:06

SNN6: A Puppy Town Protest

More than 25 protesters showed up to participate in a CAPS –sponsored protest of Puppy Town in Sarasota on Sunday, April 15. Puppy Town, which also has a store in Tampa, buys dogs from puppy mills in the Midwest that have serious violations of the Animal Welfare Act and from an Internet seller in Georgia who does not have a USDA license. ABC Sarasota and Sarasota News Network (SNN) covered the protest.

Published in CAPS News

Update: Laguna Beach Passes Ordinance
Publication/Event date: 2012-05-01
Publication name: Puppy Mill Mom
URL for more info:
Laguna Beach City Council Members, The Companion Animal Protection Society ( is a national, non-profit organization that exclusively investigates pet factories, puppy mills and pet stores. We have a national record of success exposing commercial breeding operations that violate federal and state laws. Our investigations and direct action campaigns have led to the ordinances that ban the sale of puppy mill dogs and cats you see being passed throughout California. We assisted the cities of West Hollywood and Glendale in the drafting of their ordinances. The Los Angeles ordinance, which is in the works, is based on the evidence from our investigations and our recommendations. Continue reading…

Published in CAPS News
Page 3 of 3

Bea's Beat

Blog with CAPS Spokesmodel Beatrice, a puppy mill survivor and vegan advocate.

Blog with Beatrice!

Deborah Howard

Deborah Howard

Learn more about Deborah Howard, president and founder of Companion Animal Protection Society.

Meet Deborah


Keep up-to-date about CAPS and read about issues affecting companion animals, especially those suffering in pet shops and puppy mills.

Visit CAPS Blog

Contact Us

Contact CAPS

Companion Animal Protection Society (CAPS)
759 CJC Hwy., #332
Cohasset, MA 02025
p: 339-309-0272
501 (c)(3) Tax ID#: 58-2040413

Contact by Webform

Class Action Lawsuits

scales of justice

If you purchased a sick or dying puppy from Barkworks or Happiness is Pets, you may be able to join consumer class action lawsuits. The first step is to fill out the CAPS complaint form.

Read more about Happiness is Pets or Barkworks.

CAPS Complaint Form